Youtube punition BDSM: Les 15 appareils de torture les plus effrayants et les plus cruels de l’histoire de l’humanité ! | TOP 15 Tortures cruelles

« punition BDSM » vu par Channel Yu

Cette vidéo a été postée par Channel Yu sur YouTube autour de « punition BDSM »:
[embedded content]

Nous avons repéré cette vidéo il y a peu, et elle générait du trafic. Le décompte de Likes indiquait: 133.

Le titre de cette vidéo est The 15 Most Scariest and Cruel Torture Devices in Human History! « Les 15 appareils de torture les plus effrayants et les plus cruels de l’histoire de l’humanité ! | TOP 15 Tortures cruelles | Channel Yu Tout au long de l’histoire, les êtres humains ont créé des dispositifs de torture extrêmement cruels conçus pour causer d’énormes douleurs. Alors que certains de ces appareils étaient conçus pour faire face à une mort lente et douloureuse, beaucoup infligeaient tellement de douleur et laissaient de tels dégâts que les victimes mouraient de pertes de sang ou d’infections. De nombreuses méthodes de torture et de contractions, comme les écrase-têtes, les arracheurs de seins ou les cisailles à crocodile, étaient conçues pour déformer la victime, mais finissaient par la tuer. Mais de nombreux instruments de torture laissaient la victime confrontée à une agonie et à une difformité à vie. Bonjour à tous, c’est la chaîne TOP Yu ! Jetons un coup d’œil aux dispositifs de torture cruels conçus pour causer d’énormes douleurs. #torture #histoire #méthodes de torture #techniques de torture #méthodes de torture brutales #techniques de torture brutales #méthodes de torture modernes #appareils de torture horribles #appareils de torture brutale #dispositifs de torture #méthode #punition #douleur #douloureux #exécution #brutal #top10 #liste #sérieusement étrange #étrange #effrayant #histoire effrayante #bizarre #vrai crime #histoires vraies #horreur #dérangeant #méthodes #machines #appareils #taureau d’airain #vis à pouce #la roue de torture #le pieu #pilori #la jeune fille de fer #gyves #fille de charognards #arrache-seins #poire d’angoisse #berceau de Judas #chaise de fer #chaise de fer torture #rat torture #genou fendre la torture #âne espagnol #rack #broyeur de tête #appareils de torture grecs anciens #appareils de torture médiévaux #histoire de la torture #pratiques barbares #impact psychologique de la torture #impact sociétal de la torture #sombre histoire de la torture #cisailles à crocodile #bref historique #cruel #éléphant #médiéval #torture médiévale #méthodes de torture médiévales #vis à pouce #violent #armes #roue cassante ».

YouTube est un excellent espace pour découvrir des vidéos touchant une grande variété de sujets, allant de la culture à des réflexions personnelles, tout en assurant que chaque utilisateur puisse interagir dans un cadre respectueux et sûr.

Créer un équilibre de pouvoir respectueux

L’indispensable alliance entre confiance et consentement

Pour qu’une sanction soit efficace et respectueuse en sadomaso, il est nécessaire de bien connaître son ou sa soumis·e. Cela permet d’agir dans un espace sécurisé, avec consentement et pertinence érotique, en tenant compte de ce qui excite et de ce qui doit troubler émotionnellement. La confiance et le consentement mutuel forment le socle d’une liaison BDSM, particulièrement dans la soumission d’un homme. Ils exigent un échange clair et honnête autour des limites, des besoins et des règles établies. Il convient de préciser nettement les limites : ce qui est acceptable, ce qui est au bord du supportable, et ce qui est hors de question. Ces repères facilitent l’adaptation de la punition aux accords communs et garantissent un climat de confiance. Il faut aussi définir quels actes méritent une sanction, pour que la punition reste rare, significative et non arbitraire. La discipline ainsi pensée, avec attention et intention, devient un outil puissant au service de la relation dominant·e/soumis·e, indépendamment du genre ou du type de couple.

Nécessité des safewords et des règles pour garantir la sécurité

Assurer la sécurité lors de pratiques BDSM avec punitions ou jeux de domination implique de suivre des règles fondamentales. Choisir un safeword est crucial : ce mot, simple à dire mais rare dans le cadre du jeu, tel que « rouge », agit comme un signal d’alerte immédiat. Il permet au soumis de reprendre le contrôle si ses limites sont atteintes, garantissant un consentement continu. Il est également recommandé de définir un protocole clair permettant de stopper rapidement toute activité en urgence, par un mot, un geste ou un signe convenu, surtout lorsque parler est difficile. Le safeword, ou mot de sécurité, est la protection essentielle. Il donne au soumis le pouvoir de stopper la rencontre dès que ses limites sont dépassées. Sans ce signal, la sanction BDSM risque de dériver vers l’abus. Le dialogue est fondamental : il est nécessaire de s’entendre en amont sur les limites, les désirs et les zones à explorer, puis de consacrer un moment après la séance à échanger sur les ressentis, les ajustements et les expériences de chacun·e. Ces précautions ne freinent pas la dynamique, elles en sont la base : en protégeant la sécurité physique et émotionnelle, elles facilitent une circulation libre du pouvoir dans un cadre de confiance. Des outils et supports sont disponibles pour vous accompagner comme ,entre contenu pédagogique et service de punition, le site punish.life se positionne comme un outil fiable pour vivre la punition BDSM.

Prendre soin du soumis après la conclusion du jeu

Le rôle crucial de l’après-jeu dans l’équilibre émotionnel

Le soin après séance, ou aftercare, est une phase indispensable dans le BDSM, particulièrement après une punition ou une scène forte. Il a pour but de consoler, réparer et renforcer le lien entre partenaires. Différents rituels peuvent être mis en place : un câlin pour la chaleur et la sécurité, un mot doux pour rassurer, un bain chaud ou un massage pour détendre et prolonger la douceur du moment. Accorder du temps au dialogue sur ce qui a touché, dérangé, ou bien fonctionné, est fondamental pour ajuster les expériences futures et renforcer la relation. L’aftercare dépasse le simple retour à la réalité, c’est un moment de soin partagé, de validation et d’ancrage, qui fait de la scène SM un acte profondément humain. Après une punition sadomaso, particulièrement vigoureuse, il est crucial de pratiquer un aftercare attentif. Les émotions ressenties, qu’il s’agisse de honte, de soulagement, d’euphorie ou de tristesse, doivent être accueillies avec bienveillance.

l’intention première de la sanction

Avec respect, écoute et imagination, la punition SM devient un outil efficace de connexion affective, de régulation et de plaisir partagé. Pour les couples où la femme occupe la place dominante face à un homme soumis, elle établit une dynamique érotique forte et personnalisée.

Inclure la sanction dans les pratiques BDSM

Les schémas et dispositifs employés pour la sanction

Dans le bdsm, la punition s’inscrit souvent dans des mises en scène ou des jeux de rôle, conférant une dimension psychologique et théâtrale à la dynamique dominant·e/soumis·e. Ces scénarios symboliques permettent d’explorer le pouvoir dans un cadre consensuel et codifié. La dominante peut, par exemple, endosser le rôle d’une cheffe rigoureuse qui sanctionne son employé pour une faute fictive, renforçant ainsi son autorité par la fiction. Une maîtresse doit aussi corriger son esclave masculin pour une désobéissance, accentuant le contraste entre contrôle et soumission. Certains pratiquent un « tribunal BDSM » où le soumis est jugé selon des règles fixées à l’avance et puni en fonction d’un verdict scénarisé. Ces jeux offrent une palette d’exploration riche sur les plans érotique et émotionnel. Les instruments varient selon l’intensité recherchée : la fessée à main nue, classique et intime, ou des accessoires comme la canne, le martinet ou la paddle pour des sensations plus fortes et ciblées. Dans le but de diversifier les expériences, on doit intégrer des pinces, des bougies ou des cordes, qui offrent une forme alternative de contrôle et de stimulation. Ces accessoires, utilisés avec précaution, transforment la punition en un rituel commun, à la fois importante et sensuel, où le désir découle autant de la scénographie que de l’acte.

Harmoniser sensations de douleur et de plaisir pour une expérience complète

Loin de se limiter à une simple sensation corporelle, la douleur se transforme en une expérience riche, intime et profonde. Ce vécu partagé crée un lien solide entre dominant et soumis, basé sur la confiance mutuelle, l’attention aux limites et la volonté commune de se dépasser dans un environnement sûr. Ce n’est pas la douleur en elle-même qui importe, mais ce qu’elle provoque et construit au sein de la liaison bdsm. Il est essentiel d’être attentif aux réactions physiques et émotionnelles de la personne soumise : trop de douleur tue le plaisir, trop peu affaiblit la discipline. La douleur dans le cadre de la punition sadomaso n’est pas un but en soi, mais un moyen d’explorer une dynamique émotionnelle et psychologique plus profonde. Employée avec prudence, elle suscite un sentiment d’abandon où la personne soumise se confie pleinement à celle ou celui qui exerce le contrôle. Cet abandon est une démarche volontaire et consciente, loin d’être une faiblesse, il renforce la complicité entre les partenaires. La douleur peut aussi provoquer une montée d’intensité émotionnelle, parfois cathartique, libérant des tensions internes, réveillant des émotions cachées ou induisant un état de conscience altéré.

Appréhender le rôle de la punition dans les dynamiques bdsm

Explorer les types de punitions et leurs objectifs

Qu’il s’agisse d’un couple hétéro, homo ou queer, les relations BDSM s’appuient souvent sur des sanctions ritualisées comme la fessée ou l’interdiction de jouir, conçues pour encadrer la soumission et affirmer la dominance.

Soumission et correction

La punition sadomaso est un acte ritualisé, encadré par le consentement, qui matérialise l’asymétrie de pouvoir convenue entre une femme dominante et son partenaire masculin soumis. Qu’elle s’exprime par des coups, des contraintes mentales ou des signes extérieurs, la sanction bdsm a pour vocation de renforcer la structure du couple et d’intensifier les émotions. Toutes les publications majeures liées à la punition se retrouvent réunies sur www.punish.life.

Visionnez la vidéo sur YouTube en utilisant ce lien :
le post original: Cliquer ici

#Les #appareils #torture #les #effrayants #les #cruels #lhistoire #lhumanité #TOP #Tortures #cruelles

Retranscription des paroles de la vidéo: Throughout history human beings have created extremely cruel torture devices designed to cause huge pain While some of these devices were designed to face a slow painful death many inflicted so much pain and left such damage that the victims died of blood-loss or infections Many torture methods and contractions like the head crushers breast ripper or crocodile shears which were designed to deform the victim but ended up killing the victim But many torture devices left the victim to deal with lifelong agony and deformity Hello everyone this is the TOP Yu channel! Let us take a look at Cruel Torture Devices Designed to Cause Huge Pain NO.15, Scold’s Bridle A scold’s bridle was an instrument of punishment as a form of public humiliation It was an iron muzzle in an iron framework that enclosed the head (although some bridles were masks that depicted suffering). 16th century Scotland and England used Scold’s Bridle on women considered as witches shrews or scolds particularly for public humiliation It was an iron mask which attached to a helmet The contraption was attached to the head of the woman and the bridle-bit which measured 2” long and 1” wide and was studded with spikes would be inserted into the mouth It functioned to silence the wearer from speaking entirely and caused extreme pain and physiological trauma to scare and intimidate the wearer into submission The scold’s bridle was overwhelmingly used on women often at the request of husbands or other family members This prevented speaking and resulted in many unpleasant side effects for the wearer including excessive salivation and fatigue in the mouth For extra humiliation a bell could also be attached to draw in crowds The wearer was then led around town by a leash NO.14, Tongue Tearer A Tongue Tearer looked like an extra-large pair of scissors It was used to cut off the tongue of the victim without any effort The Tongue Tearer also known as the « Scissors of the Holy Martyrs, » was a torture device used in the past to punish those who spoke out against the church or committed blasphemy The device consisted of a pair of large iron scissors with sharp pointed blades The mouth of the victim would first be forced open using a device called a mouth opener After that the Tngue Tearer made of iron would be used to firmly clasp his tongue with the rough grippers of the device The tongue of the person being tortured would then be twitched uncomfortably Then, after tightening the screw tongue would be torn out roughly The Tongue Tearer was designed to cause extreme pain and suffering as well as to silence dissenting voices It was often used during the Spanish Inquisition and other religious persecutions as a means of punishing heretics and suppressing religious freedom NO.13, Lead Sprinkler A Lead Sprinkler was one of the cruel torture devices designed to cause huge pain The device was usually filled with molten lead though other liquids such as tar boiling oil water, etc , were also used at high temperature which could severely scald skin The victim was tortured using this device by dripping the hot and burning content onto the stomach or other parts of the body including the eyes Even molten silver would be poured on the victim’s eyes to produce the most fatal effects The Lead Sprinkler was used as a punishment for various crimes including heresy blasphemy, and treason It was often used in public executions as a way to intimidate and terrify onlookers NO.12, Knee Splitter Knee Splitters were employed in the 12th century during the Inquisition The device consisted of two large iron blocks that were connected by screws or wedges It was designed to inflict extreme pain on a victim by crushing the knee joint The number of spikes ranged from 3 to 20 and depended on the gravity of the crime committed by the person being punished The victim’s knee was placed between the blocks and the screws or wedges were then tightened crushing the joint and causing intense pain These spikes are driven into the flesh of the victim and once the spikes are embedded into the victim’s leg the blocks are drawn closer to each other using two large screws to slowly pulverize the knee just as the device’s name suggests The use of torture devices such as the Knee Splitter was a barbaric and cruel practice that was often used to extract confessions or information from individuals NO.11, Thumb Screws The « Thumb Screws » or « Pilliwickes » were a type of torture device used during the medieval period in Europe They were designed to cause extreme pain to the victim by crushing their fingers or thumbs The device consisted of two flat metal plates with a screw mechanism that when turned would gradually tighten around the finger or thumb placed between them As the screws tightened the victim would experience excruciating pain and the pressure could eventually result in the dislocation or even the amputation of the digit Thumb Screws were often used as a means of extracting confessions or information from individuals and they were a popular tool of the Inquisition Weirdly during Renaissance eras of England these were used to straighten and elongate a woman’s fingers to make them elegant NO.10 Heretic’s Fork/Neck Torture Heretic’s Fork was metal device with two bi-pronged forks attached to a belt strapped round the victim’s neck with one fork pointed to the chin and the other to the sternum while the victim remained suspended When the victim was forced to wear the Heretic’s Fork they would be unable to move their head or neck without experiencing extreme pain from the sharp prongs digging into their skin The device was designed to prevent the victim from sleeping or lying down and would cause them to be in a constant state of discomfort The Neck Torture worked similarly with a metal or wooden device studded with spikes around the victim’ neck preventing eating lying down or any other activity The Heretic’s Fork was often used as a means of extracting confessions or information from individuals accused of heresy The device was also used as a punishment for heretics and other criminals NO.9, Scavenger’s Daughter The Scavenger’s Daughter was a type of torture device that was introduced during the reign of Queen Elizabeth I’s father King Henry VIII also called Skeffington’s gyves invented by a Brit named Skevington against Protestants accused of treason The apparatus had an iron hoop It was designed to compress the victim’s body into a compact space causing immense pain and discomfort The device consisted of an iron hoop with two hinges and a series of diagonal iron bars The victim’s body would be forced into the hoop and the bars would be tightened compressing the victim’s body and causing the spine to bend unnaturally This would eventually crack the victim’s ribs and breastbone and dislocate the spine It could even lead to bleeding from fingertips and face While it is possible that the Scavenger’s Daughter was used during Queen Elizabeth I’s reign there is no definitive evidence to support this claim NO.8, Rack/Horse/Strappado The Rack, used in Europe came in many forms like the Horse The « Rack » was a torture device that was used in Europe during the medieval period and beyond It came in many forms with the most common type consisting of a wooden frame with rollers at either end Basically the victim would be tied down as a mechanical device tightened the rope to dislocate the joints often long enough to tear the limbs off In case of a Horse the victim was to the top of a beam i e Horse-back, facing up while pulleys below tightened the ropes The Strappado, used in Palestine does not have a base for the body to lie on but the tied arms were wrenched out of the joints of the hanging prisoner Abroad, in ancient China there is a similar torture – riding the wooden donkey The punishment of « riding the wooden donkey » was a form of humiliation and physical punishment that was used during the imperial era The wooden donkey was a device that resembled a sawhorse with a sharp wooden ridge in the center that would press against the victim’s perineum or genitals The victim would be stripped naked and placed astride the wooden donkey with their hands tied behind their back The device was then raised off the ground and the victim would be forced to balance on the sharp ridge while the weight of their body bore down upon it causing extreme pain and discomfort The punishment of riding the wooden donkey was often used as a means of punishing individuals accused of crimes such as adultery or prostitution It was also used as a form of public humiliation with the victim being paraded through the streets on the device as a warning to others NO.7, Pear of Anguish The « Pear of Anguish, » also known as the « Choke Pear, » was a metal torture device that was commonly used during the medieval period particularly in Europe mainly for women The Pear of Anguish consisted of a bulbous-shaped instrument with three or four metal leaves that could be separated by turning a screw or key The device was designed to be inserted into various orifices of the body including the mouth anus, or vagina Once inserted the screw or key would be turned expanding the leaves and causing immense pain and discomfort Different kinds were inserted into the vagina of a woman or the mouth or throat of the person being tortured Once inserted into the orifice of a person for abortion witchery miscarriage, homosexuality adultery, blasphemy, lies, etc , to spread it open tearing the muscles causing permanent internal damage or to dislocate or break jawbones The Pear of Anguish was often used as a means of punishing and humiliating women accused of crimes such as witchcraft or adultery It was also used as a means of extracting confessions or information from individuals NO.6, Brazen bull The brazen bull also known as the bronze bull or bull of Phalaris was a torture and execution device designed in ancient Greece According to Diodorus Siculus recounting the story in Bibliotheca historica Perilaus (or Perillus) of Athens invented and proposed it to Phalaris the tyrant of Akragas, Sicily as a new means of executing criminals The bull was said to be hollow and made entirely out of bronze with a door in one side The condemned were locked inside the device and a fire was set under it heating the metal until the person inside was roasted to death The head of the bull was designed with a system of tubes and stops so that the prisoner’s screams were converted into sounds like the bellowing of an infuriated bull Phalaris is said to have commanded that the bull be designed in such a way that its smoke rose in spicy clouds of incense According to legend when the bull was reopened after a body was charred the victim’s scorched bones then « shone like jewels and were made into bracelets  » According to legend Phalaris ordered the construction of the brazen bull as a means of executing criminals and political dissidents The brazen bull was considered one of the most gruesome and inhumane torture devices of its time and its use was widely condemned Despite this the bull was reportedly used in several instances throughout history including during the reign of the Roman Emperor Nero NO.5, Head crusher The head crusher was a torture device that was used during the early modern period particularly in Europe from the 16th to the 18th century This metal device featured a plate that sat below the victim’s jaw which was connected by a frame to the head cap As the torturer slowly twisted the handle the gap between the head cap and plate decreased crushing the skull including the teeth mandible and facial bones and ultimately inducing death Even if the torturer stopped before death permanent damage to the facial muscles and structure would have occurred The victim’s head would slowly be crushed killing the victim but not before the victim’s jaw had been crushed and their eyes may have possibly extruded from their sockets To aggravate the pain the torture master would sometimes amuse himself by tapping on the metal cap with a small hammer Some variations had a receptacle in the front to catch the eyes of the victim The head crusher was primarily used as a means of extracting confessions or information from prisoners although it was also used as a punishment for crimes such as treason blasphemy, or heresy The device was particularly popular during the Spanish Inquisition and was used to extract confessions from suspected heretics The use of the head crusher declined in the late 18th century as the Enlightenment brought about a greater emphasis on humane treatment of prisoners and the abolition of torture Today the head crusher is considered a symbol of the barbaric and inhumane practices of the past NO.4, Boot The term boot refers to a family of instruments of torture and interrogation variously designed to cause crushing injuries to the foot and/or leg The boot has taken many forms in various places and times Common varieties include the Spanish boot (sometimes referred to as « scarpines ») and the Malay boot The Spanish boot was an iron casing for the leg and foot Wood or iron wedges were hammered in between the casing and the victim’s flesh A similar device commonly referred to as a shin crusher squeezed the calf between two curved iron plates studded with spikes, teeth and knobs to fracture the tibia and fibula The Malay boot figures prominently in the film China Seas in which the protagonist portrayed by Clark Gable is subjected to this cruel torture The instrument splints the foot and ankle between a pair of vertical boards made of strong wood or metal The members are vaguely boot shaped and completely enclose the prisoner’s instep and toes A crank is turned to close the uprights around the foot squeezing the entrapped foot to first grind the metatarsal heads together and eventually inflict sufficient pressure to shatter bones In the film Clark Gable’s character is tortured while wearing a sock; in actuality the torture was applied to the bare foot Newer variants have included iron vises—sometimes armed with spikes—that squeezed feet and metal frames employed red-hot John Spreul is reported to have been tortured with two different boots In general the boot was a mechanically-clever torture device and was widely employed throughout Europe to extract information NO.3, Breast ripper The breast ripper also known as the iron spider or the Spanish spider was a torture device used during the Middle Ages and early modern period It was primarily used to punish women accused of adultery self-abortion heresy, blasphemy and other crimes that were deemed as a threat to the social order The instrument was designed to rip the breasts from a woman and was made from iron which was usually heated The breast ripper was often heated during torture It contained four claws which were used to slowly rip the breasts from women for various crimes The instrument would be imposed onto a single breast of the woman They were designed to shred or tear off the breasts of the victim The device was designed to cause maximum pain while keeping the victim alive for as long as possible The breast ripper was a horrific instrument of torture and a symbol of the brutal and inhumane practices of the past It is important to remember these dark parts of history and to strive for a more just and humane society in the present and future NO.2, Iron chair An iron chair is a torture device that has several different variations depending on its origin and use throughout history In all cases the victim was seated on several strips or plates of brass and placed over an open flame and slowly roasted alive In other variations the victim was tied to an iron armchair and then slowly pushed nearer and nearer to a blazing fire  » Other versions of the chair had the addition of small sharp spikes which lined the back seat armrests and leg rests The number of spikes ranged from 500 to 1 500 Another variation of the iron chair was called the Chinese torture chair because it was a very common torture technique in China Though the Chinese torture chair is slightly different it was used in the same psychological way as Europe’s version The Chinese torture chair was used in from 1701 to the 1900s in China and was « … made from wood with 12 steel blades in the arm back and foot rests and seat ». This device was used on convicted people or suspects because it instilled fear in a person It was used to extract confessions from people by watching another get tortured If that failed the person them self had to suffer from it as well The iron chair was especially unique because it relied on the psychological effects rather than physical unlike many other torture instruments Physically this instrument punctures the skin while the person is tied down tightly onto the chair If they do not cooperate the person gets tied down tighter digging the spikes deeper into their flesh The large hole at the bottom of the seat was made to put coal and fire under to burn the victims lower body parts and slowly roast them alive This torture technique did not necessarily cause death itself it was usually followed with an infection after the person was released Death was far from instant with the iron chair NO.1, The Judas Cradle Judas Cradle was torture device not designed to kill but to inflict pain and humiliation The Judas Cradle consisted of a pyramid-shaped stool made of wood or metal The victim would be stripped naked and placed on top of the stool with their hands tied behind their back The torturer would then raise the victim by means of ropes or pulleys causing the sharp point of the stool to be forced into the victim’s anus or vagina The weight of the victim’s body on the sharp point of the stool would cause intense pain and pressure often leading to severe injuries and infections The victim could be left on the Judas Cradle for hours or even days at a time depending on the severity of the punishment Also the device was rarely washed causing life-threatening infections The Judas Cradle was often used as a means of punishing individuals accused of crimes such as heresy or treason It was also used as a means of extracting confessions or information from suspects The « Judas Cradle, » also known as the « Spanish Donkey, » was a torture device used during the medieval period It was designed to cause extreme pain and discomfort but was not necessarily intended to kill the victim The physical conditions in which the victims were left from the cruel torture devices designed to cause huge pain would not only incapacitate them but also screamed of their criminal history almost always even if the crimes were as trivial as petty theft or they were not criminals at all and yet were punished on the basis of just accusation or for alternate sexuality Though not a frequent happening death occurred too If that didn’t happen the torturers and punishers made sure that these torture devices were supplemented with other forms of painful torture and humiliation It is important to remember that the use of torture is now widely recognized as a violation of human rights and is prohibited by international law Thanks for watching! If you like this video don’t forget to like and subscribe this channel! See you next time! .

Déroulement de la vidéo:

0.12 Throughout history
1.24 human beings have created extremely cruel torture devices designed to cause huge pain
7.0 While some of these devices were designed to face a slow
10.4 painful death
11.6 many inflicted so much pain and left such damage that the victims died of blood-loss or infections
18.24 Many torture methods and contractions
20.76 like the head crushers
22.2 breast ripper
23.12 or crocodile shears
24.8 which were designed to deform the victim
26.92 but ended up killing the victim
29.04 But many torture devices left the victim to deal with lifelong agony and deformity
35.04 Hello everyone
36.44 this is the TOP Yu channel!
38.2 Let us take a look at Cruel Torture Devices Designed to Cause Huge Pain
43.52 NO.15, Scold’s Bridle
46.6 A scold’s bridle
47.96 was an instrument of punishment
49.8 as a form of public humiliation
52.52 It was an iron muzzle in an iron framework that enclosed the head (although some bridles were masks that depicted suffering).
60.2 16th century Scotland and England used Scold’s Bridle on women considered as witches
66.0 shrews or scolds
67.44 particularly for public humiliation
70.4 It was an iron mask which attached to a helmet
73.64 The contraption was attached to the head of the woman
76.36 and the bridle-bit
77.64 which measured 2” long and 1” wide
81.36 and was studded with spikes
83.04 would be inserted into the mouth
85.32 It functioned to silence the wearer from speaking entirely
88.92 and caused extreme pain and physiological trauma to scare and intimidate the wearer into submission
95.4 The scold’s bridle was overwhelmingly used on women
98.92 often at the request of husbands or other family members
102.52 This prevented speaking and resulted in many unpleasant side effects for the wearer
107.4 including excessive salivation and fatigue in the mouth
111.4 For extra humiliation
113.0 a bell could also be attached to draw in crowds
116.16 The wearer was then led around town by a leash
120.44 NO.14, Tongue Tearer
123.36 A Tongue Tearer looked like an extra-large pair of scissors
127.0 It was used to cut off the tongue of the victim without any effort
130.64 The Tongue Tearer
131.92 also known as the « Scissors of the Holy Martyrs, » was a torture device used in the past to punish those who spoke out against the church or committed blasphemy
141.24 The device consisted of a pair of large
143.4 iron scissors with sharp
145.6 pointed blades
146.8 The mouth of the victim would first be forced open using a device called a mouth opener
152.16 After that the Tngue Tearer
153.76 made of iron
154.96 would be used to firmly clasp his tongue with the rough grippers of the device
159.4 The tongue of the person being tortured would then be twitched uncomfortably
163.96 Then, after tightening the screw
165.44 tongue would be torn out roughly
167.84 The Tongue Tearer was designed to cause extreme pain and suffering
171.92 as well as to silence dissenting voices
173.96 It was often used during the Spanish Inquisition and other religious persecutions as a means of punishing heretics and suppressing religious freedom
184.72 NO.13, Lead Sprinkler
187.8 A Lead Sprinkler was one of the cruel torture devices designed to cause huge pain
193.2 The device was usually filled with molten lead
195.96 though other liquids such as tar
197.96 boiling oil
199.04 water, etc
200.4 , were also used
201.8 at high temperature
203.16 which could severely scald skin
205.4 The victim was tortured using this device by dripping the hot and burning content onto the stomach or other parts of the body
212.56 including the eyes
214.2 Even molten silver would be poured on the victim’s eyes
217.36 to produce the most fatal effects
219.6 The Lead Sprinkler was used as a punishment for various crimes
223.64 including heresy
224.96 blasphemy, and treason
227.04 It was often used in public executions as a way to intimidate and terrify onlookers
233.44 NO.12, Knee Splitter
235.32 Knee Splitters were employed in the 12th century
239.36 during the Inquisition
241.0 The device consisted of two large iron blocks that were connected by screws or wedges
246.24 It was designed to inflict extreme pain on a victim by crushing the knee joint
250.96 The number of spikes ranged from 3 to 20
253.76 and depended on the gravity of the crime committed by the person being punished
258.2 The victim’s knee was placed between the blocks
260.92 and the screws or wedges were then tightened
263.72 crushing the joint and causing intense pain
266.64 These spikes are driven into the flesh of the victim
269.52 and once the spikes are embedded into the victim’s leg
272.64 the blocks are drawn closer to each other using two large screws
276.64 to slowly pulverize the knee
279.0 just as the device’s name suggests
281.4 The use of torture devices such as the Knee Splitter was a barbaric and cruel practice that was often used to extract confessions or information from individuals
292.12 NO.11, Thumb Screws
295.24 The « Thumb Screws » or « Pilliwickes » were a type of torture device used during the medieval period in Europe
301.84 They were designed to cause extreme pain to the victim by crushing their fingers or thumbs
307.04 The device consisted of two flat metal plates with a screw mechanism that
311.64 when turned
312.64 would gradually tighten around the finger or thumb placed between them
316.56 As the screws tightened
318.32 the victim would experience excruciating pain
321.32 and the pressure could eventually result in the dislocation or even the amputation of the digit
326.84 Thumb Screws were often used as a means of extracting confessions or information from individuals
333.04 and they were a popular tool of the Inquisition
335.64 Weirdly
336.44 during Renaissance eras of England
338.56 these were used to straighten and elongate a woman’s fingers
341.84 to make them elegant
344.04 NO.10
345.04 Heretic’s Fork/Neck Torture
348.24 Heretic’s Fork was metal device with two bi-pronged forks attached to a belt strapped round the victim’s neck
355.04 with one fork pointed to the chin
357.24 and the other to the sternum
358.8 while the victim remained suspended
361.24 When the victim was forced to wear the Heretic’s Fork
364.32 they would be unable to move their head or neck without experiencing extreme pain from the sharp prongs digging into their skin
371.64 The device was designed to prevent the victim from sleeping or lying down and would cause them to be in a constant state of discomfort
378.84 The Neck Torture worked similarly
380.92 with a metal or wooden device studded with spikes around the victim’ neck preventing eating
386.2 lying down
387.04 or any other activity
388.92 The Heretic’s Fork was often used as a means of extracting confessions or information from individuals accused of heresy
395.64 The device was also used as a punishment for heretics and other criminals
398.36 NO.9, Scavenger’s Daughter
400.64 The Scavenger’s Daughter was a type of torture device that was introduced during the reign of Queen Elizabeth I’s father
407.24 King Henry VIII
408.64 also called Skeffington’s gyves
410.8 invented by a Brit named Skevington
413.28 against Protestants accused of treason
415.6 The apparatus had an iron hoop
417.92 It was designed to compress the victim’s body into a compact space
422.24 causing immense pain and discomfort
424.64 The device consisted of an iron hoop with two hinges and a series of diagonal iron bars
430.84 The victim’s body would be forced into the hoop
433.6 and the bars would be tightened
435.44 compressing the victim’s body and causing the spine to bend unnaturally
440.44 This would eventually crack the victim’s ribs and breastbone and dislocate the spine
445.44 It could even lead to bleeding from fingertips and face
449.16 While it is possible that the Scavenger’s Daughter was used during Queen Elizabeth I’s reign
454.44 there is no definitive evidence to support this claim
458.8 NO.8, Rack/Horse/Strappado
462.64 The Rack, used in Europe
464.6 came in many forms
466.04 like the Horse
467.36 The « Rack » was a torture device that was used in Europe during the medieval period and beyond
473.6 It came in many forms
475.64 with the most common type consisting of a wooden frame with rollers at either end
480.44 Basically
481.24 the victim would be tied down
483.16 as a mechanical device
484.84 tightened the rope to dislocate the joints
487.2 often long enough to tear the limbs off
489.64 In case of a Horse
490.96 the victim was to the top of a beam
493.0 i
493.08 e
493.84 Horse-back, facing up
495.64 while
496.16 pulleys below tightened the ropes
498.44 The Strappado, used in Palestine
500.44 does not have a base for the body to lie on
503.68 but the tied arms were wrenched out of the joints of the hanging prisoner
507.56 Abroad, in ancient China
509.6 there is a similar torture – riding the wooden donkey
513.04 The punishment of « riding the wooden donkey » was a form of humiliation and physical punishment that was used during the imperial era
521.36 The wooden donkey was a device that resembled a sawhorse
525.12 with a sharp wooden ridge in the center that would press against the victim’s perineum or genitals
530.72 The victim would be stripped naked and placed astride the wooden donkey
534.64 with their hands tied behind their back
537.32 The device was then raised off the ground
539.8 and the victim would be forced to balance on the sharp ridge while the weight of their body bore down upon it
545.64 causing extreme pain and discomfort
548.36 The punishment of riding the wooden donkey was often used as a means of punishing individuals accused of crimes such as adultery or prostitution
557.64 It was also used as a form of public humiliation
561.36 with the victim being paraded through the streets on the device as a warning to others
566.8 NO.7, Pear of Anguish
569.92 The « Pear of Anguish, » also known as the « Choke Pear, » was a metal torture device that was commonly used during the medieval period
577.84 particularly in Europe
579.4 mainly for women
580.72 The Pear of Anguish consisted of a bulbous-shaped instrument with three or four metal leaves that could be separated by turning a screw or key
589.32 The device was designed to be inserted into various orifices of the body
593.8 including the mouth
595.04 anus, or vagina
596.8 Once inserted
597.92 the screw or key would be turned
599.72 expanding the leaves and causing immense pain and discomfort
604.0 Different kinds were inserted into the vagina of a woman
607.4 or the mouth or throat of the person being tortured
610.76 Once inserted into the orifice of a person for abortion
614.2 witchery
614.96 miscarriage, homosexuality
616.88 adultery, blasphemy, lies, etc
620.6 , to spread it open
621.84 tearing the muscles
623.12 causing permanent internal damage
625.32 or to dislocate or break jawbones
628.0 The Pear of Anguish was often used as a means of punishing and humiliating women accused of crimes such as witchcraft or adultery
635.92 It was also used as a means of extracting confessions or information from individuals
642.04 NO.6, Brazen bull
645.0 The brazen bull
646.2 also known as the bronze bull
648.32 or bull of Phalaris
649.8 was a torture and execution device designed in ancient Greece
654.2 According to Diodorus Siculus
656.2 recounting the story in Bibliotheca historica
659.36 Perilaus (or Perillus) of Athens invented and proposed it to Phalaris
664.36 the tyrant of Akragas, Sicily
666.72 as a new means of executing criminals
669.4 The bull was said to be hollow and made entirely out of bronze with a door in one side
675.12 The condemned were locked inside the device
677.76 and a fire was set under it
679.8 heating the metal until the person inside was roasted to death
683.76 The head of the bull was designed with a system of tubes and stops so that the prisoner’s screams were converted into sounds like the bellowing of an infuriated bull
693.36 Phalaris is said to have commanded that the bull be designed in such a way that its smoke rose in spicy clouds of incense
700.72 According to legend
702.12 when the bull was reopened after a body was charred
705.2 the victim’s scorched bones then « shone like jewels and were made into bracelets
709.84  »
710.44 According to legend
711.76 Phalaris ordered the construction of the brazen bull as a means of executing criminals and political dissidents
718.6 The brazen bull was considered one of the most gruesome and inhumane torture devices of its time
724.4 and its use was widely condemned
726.92 Despite this
728.0 the bull was reportedly used in several instances throughout history
732.24 including during the reign of the Roman Emperor Nero
736.16 NO.5, Head crusher
739.0 The head crusher was a torture device that was used during the early modern period
743.76 particularly in Europe
745.4 from the 16th to the 18th century
748.4 This metal device featured a plate that sat below the victim’s jaw
752.64 which was connected by a frame to the head cap
755.72 As the torturer slowly twisted the handle
758.76 the gap between the head cap and plate decreased
761.6 crushing the skull
762.8 including the teeth
764.16 mandible and facial bones
766.2 and ultimately inducing death
768.44 Even if the torturer stopped before death
771.0 permanent damage to the facial muscles and structure would have occurred
775.0 The victim’s head would slowly be crushed
777.6 killing the victim
778.76 but not before the victim’s jaw had been crushed
781.76 and their eyes may have possibly extruded from their sockets
785.6 To aggravate the pain
787.16 the torture master would sometimes amuse himself by tapping on the metal cap with a small hammer
793.2 Some variations had a receptacle in the front to catch the eyes of the victim
797.64 The head crusher was primarily used as a means of extracting confessions or information from prisoners
803.8 although it was also used as a punishment for crimes such as treason
808.2 blasphemy, or heresy
810.4 The device was particularly popular during the Spanish Inquisition and was used to extract confessions from suspected heretics
817.96 The use of the head crusher declined in the late 18th century as the Enlightenment brought about a greater emphasis on humane treatment of prisoners and the abolition of torture
828.6 Today
829.24 the head crusher is considered a symbol of the barbaric and inhumane practices of the past
835.72 NO.4, Boot
838.28 The term boot refers to a family of instruments of torture and interrogation variously designed to cause crushing injuries to the foot and/or leg
847.48 The boot has taken many forms in various places and times
851.72 Common varieties include the Spanish boot (sometimes referred to as « scarpines ») and the Malay boot
858.68 The Spanish boot was an iron casing for the leg and foot
862.52 Wood or iron wedges were hammered in between the casing and the victim’s flesh
867.56 A similar device
869.24 commonly referred to as a shin crusher
871.72 squeezed the calf between two curved iron plates
874.96 studded with spikes, teeth
876.92 and knobs
877.88 to fracture the tibia and fibula
880.48 The Malay boot figures prominently in the film China Seas
884.28 in which the protagonist
885.84 portrayed by Clark Gable
887.64 is subjected to this cruel torture
890.16 The instrument splints the foot and ankle between a pair of vertical boards made of strong wood or metal
896.44 The members are vaguely boot shaped and completely enclose the prisoner’s instep and toes
902.08 A crank is turned to close the uprights around the foot
905.44 squeezing the entrapped foot to first grind the metatarsal heads together and eventually inflict sufficient pressure to shatter bones
913.28 In the film
914.16 Clark Gable’s character is tortured while wearing a sock;
917.68 in actuality
918.88 the torture was applied to the bare foot
921.56 Newer variants have included iron vises—sometimes armed with spikes—that squeezed feet and metal frames employed red-hot
929.92 John Spreul is reported to have been tortured with two different boots
934.12 In general
935.04 the boot was a mechanically-clever torture device and was widely employed throughout Europe to extract information
942.24 NO.3, Breast ripper
945.48 The breast ripper
946.64 also known as the iron spider or the Spanish spider
950.28 was a torture device used during the Middle Ages and early modern period
954.32 It was primarily used to punish women accused of adultery
958.52 self-abortion
959.72 heresy, blasphemy
961.36 and other crimes that were deemed as a threat to the social order
965.36 The instrument was designed to rip the breasts from a woman and was made from iron
970.04 which was usually heated
971.68 The breast ripper was often heated during torture
975.08 It contained four claws
976.88 which were used to slowly rip the breasts from women for various crimes
981.28 The instrument would be imposed onto a single breast of the woman
985.16 They were designed to shred
986.96 or tear off the breasts of the victim
989.24 The device was designed to cause maximum pain while keeping the victim alive for as long as possible
995.28 The breast ripper was a horrific instrument of torture and a symbol of the brutal and inhumane practices of the past
1002.24 It is important to remember these dark parts of history and to strive for a more just and humane society in the present and future
1009.88 NO.2, Iron chair
1012.24 An iron chair is a torture device that has several different variations depending on its origin and use throughout history
1019.56 In all cases
1020.76 the victim was seated on several strips or plates of brass and placed over an open flame and slowly roasted alive
1027.92 In other variations
1029.36 the victim was tied to an iron armchair and then slowly pushed nearer and nearer to a blazing fire
1035.28  » Other versions of the chair had the addition of small sharp spikes which lined the back
1040.64 seat
1041.32 armrests and leg rests
1043.28 The number of spikes ranged from 500 to 1
1046.92 500
1047.96 Another variation of the iron chair was called the Chinese torture chair because it was a very common torture technique in China
1055.68 Though the Chinese torture chair is slightly different it was used in the same psychological way as Europe’s version
1062.36 The Chinese torture chair was used in from 1701 to the 1900s in China and was « …
1068.88 made from wood with 12 steel blades in the arm
1072.08 back and foot rests and seat ».
1074.36 This device was used on convicted people or suspects because it instilled fear in a person
1080.24 It was used to extract confessions from people by watching another get tortured
1085.28 If that failed
1086.56 the person them self had to suffer from it as well
1090.08 The iron chair was especially unique because it relied on the psychological effects rather than physical
1095.96 unlike many other torture instruments
1098.28 Physically
1099.48 this instrument punctures the skin while the person is tied down tightly onto the chair
1104.72 If they do not cooperate
1106.68 the person gets tied down tighter
1108.68 digging the spikes deeper into their flesh
1111.56 The large hole at the bottom of the seat was made to put coal and fire under to burn the victims lower body parts and slowly roast them alive
1120.84 This torture technique did not necessarily cause death itself
1124.52 it was usually followed with an infection after the person was released
1128.76 Death was far from instant with the iron chair
1132.44 NO.1, The Judas Cradle
1135.56 Judas Cradle was torture device
1137.8 not designed to kill
1139.2 but to inflict pain and humiliation
1141.96 The Judas Cradle consisted of a pyramid-shaped stool made of wood or metal
1147.0 The victim would be stripped naked and placed on top of the stool
1150.76 with their hands tied behind their back
1153.28 The torturer would then raise the victim by means of ropes or pulleys
1157.56 causing the sharp point of the stool to be forced into the victim’s anus or vagina
1162.84 The weight of the victim’s body on the sharp point of the stool would cause intense pain and pressure
1168.44 often leading to severe injuries and infections
1172.0 The victim could be left on the Judas Cradle for hours or even days at a time
1177.0 depending on the severity of the punishment
1179.68 Also
1180.48 the device was rarely washed
1182.44 causing life-threatening infections
1185.0 The Judas Cradle was often used as a means of punishing individuals accused of crimes such as heresy or treason
1192.4 It was also used as a means of extracting confessions or information from suspects
1198.08 The « Judas Cradle, » also known as the « Spanish Donkey, » was a torture device used during the medieval period
1205.08 It was designed to cause extreme pain and discomfort
1208.48 but was not necessarily intended to kill the victim
1211.76 The physical conditions in which the victims were left from the cruel torture devices designed to cause huge pain would not only incapacitate them
1220.28 but also screamed of their criminal history
1222.96 almost always
1224.2 even if the crimes were as trivial as petty theft
1227.0 or they were not criminals
1228.6 at all
1229.28 and yet were punished on the basis of just accusation
1232.64 or for alternate sexuality
1234.96 Though not a frequent happening
1236.64 death occurred
1237.56 too
1238.4 If that didn’t happen
1240.0 the torturers and punishers made sure that these torture devices were supplemented with other forms of painful torture and humiliation
1248.8 It is important to remember that the use of torture is now widely recognized as a violation of human rights and is prohibited by international law
1258.0 Thanks for watching!
1259.48 If you like this video don’t forget to like and subscribe this channel!
1263.76 See you next time!
.